Dev Anand v. Union of India Thru. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Deptt. of Road, New Delhi and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7398 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dev Anand Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways Deptt. Of Road, New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Ambrish Rai,C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that he is entitled for compensation of share of his uncle who has died issueless.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case application of petitioner for the said purpose is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to move an application for the said purpose along with the succession certificate before respondent no.5-Competent Authority/Chief Revenue Officer, District-Sultanpur, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with application and succession certificate is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 30.10.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench