VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rafiuddeen @ Chhangoo and 4 Others v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 October 2023
Bench
Brij Raj Singhauthor
Case no.
10595/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 27 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10595 of 2023 Applicant :- Rafiuddeen @ Chhangoo And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶1Sri Prashant Chaurasia has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No.2 to 5, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Prashant Chaurasia learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 to 5, and Sri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶3The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed praying for quashing the impugned chargesheet dated 21.01.2015, case crime No.351/2014 under Section 147, 149, 323, 506 and 427 IPC, PS Malihabad, district Lucknow and cognizance order dated 16.7.2015 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Customs, Lucknow district Lucknow in Crl. Case No.0035674 of 2015 (State. Vs. Chhangoo and others.) pending in the Court of Special Judge SC,ST Act, Lucknow ST No.400 of 2017.

¶4Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the both the parties have amicably settled their dispute and in respect thereof, they have annexed a compromise deed endorsed as Annexure - 5 to the affidavit, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties.

¶5Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned.

¶6Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court below on 09.11.2022 and file their comprise application. The court below is directed to pass an order on the said compromise application and all formalities completed within three months from that date. The concerned Magistrate will sent a report to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not.

¶7Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶8For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case and the Court below is directed to complete verification proceedings as early as possible say within three months.

¶9The original copy of the compromise be returned to the learned counsel for the applicants as per Rules of the Court, after retaining the photocopy thereof. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Rajneesh JR-PS) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.