Sohbat Ali v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Bikapur, Ayodhya and Others

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5562 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sohbat Ali Respondent :- Tahsildar, Tahsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anuj Pratap Singh,Khushboo Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State says that in the application for mutation, annexed as annexure No.1 to the present petition, name of father of petitioner is shown as Ashraf, however, in the petition the same has been indicated as Abdul Rasheed. On being confronted, learned counsel for the petitioner says that name of father of petitioner, in fact, is Abdul Rasheed @ Ashraf and this aspect of the case has not been indicated in the petition nor in the application for mutation, as such, he may be permitted to withdraw present petition with liberty to file fresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the document(s) annexed with the petition, if any, to the learned counsel for the petitioner, as per Rules of the Court. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Vinay/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench