- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 2419/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2419 of 2023 Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Opposite Party :- Union Of India Directorate Of Enforcement Allahabad Sub Zonal Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Singh,Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rohit Tripathi Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Rohit Tripathi, the learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement and perused the records.
¶2The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Complaint No.04/2018: Session Case No336 of 2023 ECIR No.ECIR/05/PMLA/VSZO/2011 under Section 3/4 PMLA Act, 2000.
¶3Sri Rohit Tripathi, the learned counsel for Directorate of Enforcement has filed a counter affidavit and has raised a preliminary objection that in furtherance of a complaint, the applicant was summoned to face trial by means of the order dated 02.4.2018. The applicant had challenged the summoning order by filing an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.24521 of 2018 by means of the order dated 23.07.2018.
¶4The applicant has approached the Special Court by filing an application for anticipatory bail in the year 2023. The aforesaid conduct of the applicant indicates hat he has not cooperated with the proceedings and, therefore, he is not entitled to be granted prearrest bail.
¶5Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the aforesaid preliminary objection raised by learned counsel for the Directorate of Enforcement, this Court is of the view that conduct of the applicant in approaching this Court seeking anticipatory bail after a period of 5 years since rejection of his application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging validity of the summoning order, indicates that he has not cooperated with the proceedings.
¶6In view of the aforesaid facts, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is rejected. However, in case the applicant files any bail application, the same shall be considered and decided, without being influenced by rejection of this anticipatory bail application. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.