- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9527/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9527 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sudhesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Development Of Revenue, Civil Secrt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushol Kishor Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that an enquiry ought to be conducted against respondent no.4-Gram Pradhan for misappropriation of funds.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, states that there is already a Committee constituted by the District Magistrate for conducting an enquiry under Section 95(1)(g) read with Rule 3 of 1997 Rules.
¶4The statement of learned Standing Counsel is taken on record. It is expected that the enquiry shall be conducted expeditiously in accordance with law.
¶5Present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.