Anurag Kumar and Others v. The State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9510 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anurag Kumar And Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Priyanka Shahi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.

¶5Petitioners have approached this Court claiming that their labour dues are pending before the respondents which are not decided as yet. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that grievance of petitioner s would be substantially met in case representation of petitioners for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioners are permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Lakhimpur Kheri, raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioners, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench