- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9514/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9514 of 2023 Petitioner :- Surendra Pratap Pathak Respondent :- District Magistrate , Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that with regard to a Mandir property, respondent nos.15 to 19 are trying to interfere unauthorizedly in the possession of petitioner.
¶3The dispute, on the face of it, is between private parties with regard to the property in question.
¶4Petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a suit for injunction as allegations are against private individuals. The writ petition for the relief claimed is not maintainable.
¶5With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.