Canara Bank, Lko. Thru. Its Constituted Attorney Manish Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Secrt. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9513 of 2023 Petitioner :- Canara Bank, Lko. Thru. Its Constituted Attorney Manish Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court for giving effect to the application filed by the Bank under Section 14 of the SERFAESI Act.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel makes two submissions; firstly he submits that the matter is already fixed for 7.11.2023 and necessary compliance shall be made on the said date or expeditiously thereafter. His second submission is that petitioner has an alternative remedy, either to file a contempt application or move an appropriate application in its earlier writ petition i.e. Writ-C No.6357 of 2023, which was decided on

28.7.2023.

¶4The statement of learned Standing Counsel is taken on record.

¶5With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench