- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajesh Singh Chauhan
- Case no.
- CAPL 2608/2017
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2608 of 2017 Applicant :- Acharna Singh Opposite Party :- Sanjay Sinha Secy. Basic Education Board U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ajai Kumar,Gaus Beg,Ghaus Beg Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Harun Rashid, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, Dr. Amarkant Singh, the then BSA.
¶2Learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 has stated that the order of Writ Court has been complied with. The affidavit of compliance has already been filed on 24.01.2018 by Dr. Amarkant Singh, the then BSA enclosing therewith the order dated 29.12.2017 passed by the same authority, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the claim of the petitioner has wrongly been rejected by the authority, inasmuch as the proper facts and circumstances have not been appreciated correctly.
¶4Be that as it may, if the order dated 29.12.2017 (supra) has not been passed properly by appreciating the facts and circumstances correctly, the petitioner may assail the aforesaid order before the appropriate court of law, inasmuch as the authenticity or validity of the order dated 29.12.2017 may not be tested by the Contempt Court.
¶5Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.
¶6Notices, if any, are discharged. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 31.10.2023 kkv/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.