VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satyam @ Uttam Chandr v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
31 October 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
6543/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6543 of 2023 Applicant :- Satyam @ Uttam Chandr Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Suhail Kashif,Archana Rawat,Arshad Hafeez Khan,Dinesh Kr. Sharma,Shaunak Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Ms Archana Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms Parul Kant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 96 of 2023, under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Jaidpur, District Barabanki.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 03.03.2023 alleging that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter.

¶4In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., she stated that she is aged about 20 years. She knows the applicant for the past three year. She loves him and wants to marry him and she had gone with the applicant out of her own free will. She categorically stated that the applicant has not committed any misdeed against her. Victim's statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was at variance with her earlier version but even in this statement, she stated that she and the applicant were having a friendship for the past four years.

¶5In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is 21 years old innocent person having no criminal history. The applicant has been in jail since 06.03.2023.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Satyam @ Uttam Chandr be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 31.10.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.