VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shraddha Printers and Sons Reg.No. 09Aehpv1275K1Zx Varanasi Thru. Proprietor Smt.Vimla Prasad Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Dept. Basic Education, U.P. Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
1 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 9536/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9536 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shraddha Printers And Sons Reg.No. 09aehpv1275k1zx Varanasi Thru. Proprietor Smt.Vimla Prasad Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Dept. Basic Education, U.P. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner , Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. and learned standing counsel for State. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following primary relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to sanction the necessary funds and ensure the payment of outstanding dues in the tune of Rs.9,15,751/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty One Only) for the year 2021-22 along with interest @ 18% per annum." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2 Director Basic Education Department, U.P. Lucknow, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.