- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9575/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9575 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Deep Mala Soni Respondent :- Chairman Controlling Auth.Under U.P.Regulation Building Operation Act1958/D.M.Ambedkarnagar And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy of revision to challenge the impugned order passed by the Chairman of the development authority before the State Government under Section 41(3) of the Regulation of Building Operation Act, 1958.
¶2In case such a revision is filed by petitioner along with stay application, the revisional authority shall consider and decide the stay application of petitioner, expeditiously in accordance with law.
¶3It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law.
¶4The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.