- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 8468/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8468 of 2023 Petitioner :- Manbodh Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1 to 5. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party No.6 stand dispensed with.
¶2Petition has been filed challenging order dated 11th November, 2022 whereby directions have been issued for recovery from salary of persons who are liable for not providing information under Right to Information Act, 2005.
¶3Learned State Counsel has adverted to the documents on record to indicate that in fact the impugned order has not directed any recovery individually from petitioner but directions have been issued to recover the amount collectively from all the persons responsible for not providing information as required.
¶4It is submitted that in pursuance of aforesaid order, a show cause notice has been issued to petitioner which was received by him on 25th September, 2023 granting him time to file a response, which he has not filed till date. As such it is submitted that final orders are yet to be passed in pursuance of the order dated 11th November, 2022.
¶5Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, it is evident that order dated 11th November, 2022 has merely directed recovery to be effected from persons who are responsible and in pursuance thereof a show cause notice has been received by petitioner on 25th September, 2023. It is quite evident that proceedings have yet not attained finality.
¶6In view of aforesaid, petitioner is granted one week from today to file reply to the show cause notice received by him on 25th September, 2023. In case any such reply is filed within the aforesaid time frame, same shall be considered and decided prior to passing of any orders for recovery against petitioner. Opportunity of hearing shall also be provided to petitioner.
¶7With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 kvg/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.