- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9580/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9580 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naresh Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bheem Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Sri Ashok Kumar, Advocate is present on behalf of respondent no.6 and filed Power, the same is taken on record.
¶3The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the private respondent nos.6 to 8, are interfering in peaceful possession of the petitioner.
¶4The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. The petitioner has a remedy to approach the appropriate Court/authority and, if so desires, may file a suit in accordance with law.
¶5With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is consigned to record. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.