Baijnath Gaud v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and 3 Others

Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10674 of 2023 Applicant :- Baijnath Gaud Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ran Vijay Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to direct the learned Special Judge,SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar to expeditiously decide the Sessions Trial No. 108 of 2016, Case Crime No. 133 of 2016, under sections 504,506,307,302,325 of I.P.C. and Section 3(1)X of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Bhiti, District-Ambedkar Nagar. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter pertains to the year 2016, but, even after passing of about 7 years, the proceeding of the case not been concluded as yet. After arguing at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the trial court to decide the matter within the stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this court. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Considering aforesaid innocuous prayer, the trial court is directed to consider and decide the proceedings of sessions trial no. 108 of 2016, with expedition, in accordance with law considering the instructions and guidelines issued by this court; time to time if there is no legal impediment. With the aforesaid observation, the instant application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 AKS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench