Shiv Shankar and Ors v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Ors

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14854 of 2021 Petitioner :- Shiv Shankar And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the auction, as challenged in the present writ petition had already taken place. He submits that they is entitled for refund of the amount, as he could not participate in the said auction. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that grievance of petitioners would be substantially met in case representation of petitioners for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioners are permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3-Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Tehsil-Hasanganj, District Unnao, U.P. raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioners, respondent no.3, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench