- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9565/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9565 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Maa Vaishno Constructions Thru. Prop. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh Respondent :- Authorized Officer Indian Bank , Bahraich And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajey Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Vinay Shankar Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinay Shankar, learned counsel for respondents/Bank. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the possession notice dated 05.10.2023. Sri Vinay Shankar, learned counsel for the respondents/Bank states that the Bank has withdrawn the said notice due to some technical reasons. In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition. Learned counsel for the Bank states that there is an O.T.S. scheme in the Bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be approaching the Bank to avail the benefit under the O.T.S. scheme. In view of the aforesaid, it is provided that in case the petitioner approaches the Bank and fulfills the conditions of the O.T.S. scheme, the Bank concerned shall consider and decide the matter expeditiously in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.