- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- 5619/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5619 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Pratap And Others Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Judicial 2nd, Lucknow Division, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Chaubey,Ashish Gupta,Hukum Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. There is no proof regarding pendency of the application, under consideration. On being confronted on the aforesaid aspect of the case, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with proper prayer and pleadings. The aforesaid is not in dispute. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified copies of the documents, if any, annexed with this petition to the learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules in this regard. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Arun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.