- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 12916/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12916 of 2023 Applicant :- Sangam Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar,Ajay Deep Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Arvind Kumar, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 602 of 2022, under Section 420, 409, 34 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki.
¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 23.06.2022 against nine persons, including the applicant, alleging that the informant had made investment in L.L.C Multi State Agro Cooperative Society Ltd. but upon maturity of the investment, no amount was paid to her. Although, the F.I.R describes the applicant as a Director of the company.
¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in 59 cases of similar nature has been disclosed in Para 14 of the affidavit, in 5 of which the applicant has already been granted bail.
¶5The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that co-accused Yashwant Rawat, Abhishek Upadhyay, Atul Kumar Verma, Gunjan Verma and Om Prakash have already been granted bail by means of orders dated 04.04.2023, 14.07.2023,
21.09.2023, 27.09.2023 and 03.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4124 of 2023, 3272 of 2023, 11344 of 2023, 11707 of 2023 and 11589 of 2023 respectively.
¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the informant had made investment in a company and that the applicant has been granted bail in five other cases of similar nature and that five co-accused persons have already been granted bail in the present case and that the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 29.07.2021, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail in the present case.
¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
¶9Let the applicant-Sangam Verma be released on bail in Case Crime No. 602 of 2022, under Section 420, 409, 34 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: -
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.