Rajwant Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko

Court No. - 27 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12951 of 2023 Applicant :- Rajwant Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶1Heard Ms. Nisha Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Priyanka Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused record.

¶2The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in FIR No. 0525 of 2022 under Section 3 (1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities Prevention Act, 1986, PS Kotwali Nagar, district Barabanki.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that on the basis of four cases, gang chart has been prepared against the applicant and Gangsters Act has been imposed. She has submitted that in the said cases, the applicant has been granted bail copies of which has been annexed as Annexure No.3, 4 5 and 6 to the bail application. She has explained criminal history of the applicant of three cases in para-2 of the supplementary affidavit and has submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases, copies of bail order has been annexed to the supplementary affidavit collectively as Annexure No.SA-1. She has further submitted that co-accused Sanjay Singh Singhla has been granted bail by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.10661 of 2022 on 19.2.2022 and co-accused Radha Krishna Verna has been granted bail by this court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.8244 of 2022 on 26.7.2022, the copies of bail order have been annexed to the bail application as Annexure No.9 and 10. She has further submitted that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully cooperate in the proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner. She has further submitted that the applicant has no other criminal history except the aforesaid cases mentioned in the gang chart as well as in the supplementary affidavit. She has submitted that the applicant is in jail since 2.12.2022 and more than 10 months have passed in Jail.

¶4Learned A.G.A. though opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts and the fact that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown against him in the gang chart as well as the cases mentioned in the supplementary affidavit and the co-accused have been granted bail.

¶5Considering over all facts and circumstances of the case, the material available on record, contents of F.I.R., other relevant documents, nature of offence, gang chart, the argument that applicant is on bail in the case shown against him in the gang chart and the cases mentioned in the supplementary affidavit, the argument that co-accused have been granted bail, the period of incarceration of applicant in Jail for more than 10 months, this Court finds that condition of Section 19 (4) of the Gangsters Act are properly complied with, the applicant is not guilty of such offence, therefore, he is entitled to be released on bail.

¶6Let the applicant, Rajwant Yadav be released on bail in the above case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶7It is made clear that the observations made in this order are limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The Trial Court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything in this order. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Rajneesh JR-PS) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench