VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyam Ji Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Deptt. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
2 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
6577/2022

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6577 of 2022 Applicant :- Shyam Ji Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Deptt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kishor Pandey,Pramod Kumar Tiwari,Smt. Usha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rohit Tripathi Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Smt. Usha Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Parul Kant, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 615 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420 & 504 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya (Faizabad).

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 21.09.2021 against five persons, including the applicant, and his family members, stating that the accused persons had allured the informant to make investment in Maa Media House.

¶4The informant was paid some bonus for some time but thereafter he was allowed to accept employment in Maa Media House and make other persons invest in the company. The informant got Rs. 62,50,000/- invested in the company and Rs. 3,50,000/- more were paid by him by transferring the same to the applicant's account but no amount was refunded to the applicant.

¶5The learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at Bar that the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.10.2021 and even charges have not been framed till date.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the grievance of the informant is against non-refund of money invested in a company, for which no civil proceedings have been initiated; that the applicant is languishing in jail since 30.10.202021 and even charges have not been framed even expiry of a period of more than two years, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Shyam Ji Mishra be released on bail in Case Crime No. 615 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420 & 504 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya (Faizabad) on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.