VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nakchhed Ram v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 November 2023
Bench
Manish Mathurauthor
Case no.
8556/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8556 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nakchhed Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed challenging order dated 14.06.2023 submitting that pay fixation of petitioner subsequent to his superannuation has been wrongly made. Further prayer for grant of promotional pay-scale with effect from 12.09.2003 as well as second and third A.C.P. with effect from 12.09.2005 and

12.09.2015 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- & 4600/- respectively has been sought.

¶3It has been submitted that earlier petitioner was visited with punishment order dated 31.01.2004. Appeal and revision thereagainst were also rejected vide orders dated 6.11.2019

22.05.2020 respectively. The same were challenged in WRIT - A No. - 3663 of 2020 which was allowed vide judgment and order dated 27.02.2023 quashing the orders impugned therein and granting liberty to opposite parties to conduct enquiry afresh. In pursuance thereof, the Enquiry Committee vide its recommendation dated 12.06.2023 did not find it appropriate to continue enquiry proceedings against petitioner and vide order dated 14.06.2023, the said recommendations were accepted while granting pensionary benefits to petitioner and indicating the pay scale for the purposes of calculation of retiral benefits.

¶4It is submitted that aforesaid fixation of pay scale for purposes of retiral benefits does not take into account the first promotional pay scale, and second and third A.C.P. benefits.

¶5For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 05.08.2023 before the authority concerned. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer with regard to final decision on the same.

¶6Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, opposite party no.3 i.e. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Colonelganj, District Gonda or any other competent authority is directed to consider and decide representation of petitioner dated 05.08.2023 expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before authority concerned along with a copy of said representation. The pay-scale fixed vide order dated

14.06.2023 shall abide by the final decision so taken.

¶7With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 kvg/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.