VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Santosh @ Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Revenue Deptt. and 5 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 9634/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9634 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh @ Santosh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.6.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that he is having patta of Gata no.173 Minjumla, area 0.010 hectare, situated at village Maila Raiganj, Tehsil Sirauli Gauspur, District Barabanki, which has not been cancelled as yet, but still he has been unauthorizedly evicted from the property in dispute.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, states that there appears to be some order for cancellation of patta in existence.

¶4Be that as it may, petitioner may move a fresh representation before respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sirauli Gauspur, Barabanki, who shall decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order after hearing the petitioner, Gaon Sabha, State and any other necessary parties within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. In case patta has ever been cancelled by any order, copy of the said order shall also be provided to the petitioner.

¶5With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.