Anuradha Sharma @ Anuradha v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8548 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anuradha Sharma @ Anuradha Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Pandey,Ashish Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kumar Ayush,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3, and Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for respondent no.4.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed off.

¶3The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having been appointed as Assistant Teacher vide order dated 11.12.2020, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the writ petition, neither she is being permitted to perform her duties nor is she being paid regular salary.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within a week from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench