VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Firoz Alam @ Chunney v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
2 November 2023
Bench
Brij Raj Singhauthor
Case no.
11745/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 27 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11745 of 2023 Applicant :- Firoz Alam @ Chunney Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Veer Singh,Abhinav Srivastava,Piyush Pandey,Saurabh Tiwari,Sharik Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶1Counter afÏdavit filed by learned AGA is taken on record.

¶2Heard Shri Ajay Veer Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri MVS Chauhan, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶3The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.90 of 2023, under Sections 8/21 NDPS Act, Police Station Patranga, District Faizabad.

¶4It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that 70 gms of morphine is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant which is below commercial quantity. He further submitted that provisions of Section 50 of NDPS Act has not been followed and search procedure has not been adopted before the Gazetted OfÏcer. There is no independent eye witness of the said recovery. He submitted that criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 2 of the supplementary afÏdavit filed on 21.09.2023. Learned counsel submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.05.2023 and more than five months have passed.

¶5Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the fact that contraband substance recovered from the possession of the applicant is below commercial quantity.

¶6Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, after hearing learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that contraband substance recovered from the possession of the applicant is below commercial quantity; argument that more than five months have passed in jail; therefore, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of bail.

¶7Let the applicant, Firoz Alam @ Chunney be released on bail in the above case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case,

(ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶8It is made clear that the observations made in this order are limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The Trial Court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything in this order. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Pks High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.