Sudhir Kumar v. U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director, Lucknow and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8568 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director, Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed off.

¶3The petitioner, a retired employee of U.P. Jal Nigam, is before this Court claiming grant of higher pension on the ground that the person junior to him is receiving higher pension.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsel for respondents has no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench