VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Road and Transport New Delhi and Ors

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 21717/2021

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21717 of 2021 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Road And Transport New Delhi And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Hanumant Lal Yadav,Shailendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Abhinav Singh,Jyotsana Singh,Krishna Lal Yadav,Samidha Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents to pay the compensation to the petitioner of land Gata No. 905 situated at Village Sonpura, Pargana and Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh in compliance of order dated

30.01.2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh//Arbitrator. Under the interim order of this Court, the arbitrator was directed to deposit the amount of compensation payable to the petitioner. The same is decided by him vide order dated 20.10.2021 whereby the rate is fixed at Rs. 3700/- per square meter. In view thereof, the petitioner is permitted to move an application for calculation of said amount before the respondent no. 4-Chief Revenue Officer/Concerned Authority, Pratapgarh within a period of two weeks from today alongwith certified copy of this order. The respondent no. 4 shall give opportunity of hearing to all the person concerned and pass appropriate orders thereafter, in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, unless there is any legal impediment. Writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.