- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 4759/2015
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4759 of 2015 Petitioner :- Prem Shankar Dixit Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Transport And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghaus Beg Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Sri Ghaus Beg, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking direction to declare sub-Rule 4, 9 & 10 of Rule 22 of U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1998 as ultra vires to Section 12(2) of U.P Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997. While making submission, counsel for the petitioner states that he is not making any prayer with regard to sub-Rule 10 and his prayers are only with regard to sub Rule 4 & 9 of Rule 22 of the aforesaid Rules of 1998 by which the said Rules are already upheld by this Court by its judgment and order dated 30.10.2012 passed in Misc. Bench No. 8392 of 2012 (Smt. Shaheen Khan vs. State of U.P. and Ors.) Hence, the controversy is already concluded with the aforesaid judgment as such this Court is not inclined to interfere in this writ petition. If view thereof, we find no force in the present writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.