VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suraj v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
13045/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13045 of 2023 Applicant :- Suraj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilendra Pratap Singh,Arpit Shukla,Nikhil Sonkar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Nikhil Sonkar holding brief of Sri Akhilendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 148 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 316 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Sadarpur, District Sitapur.

3.The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 25.04.2023 against four persons, including the applicant, stating that because of a dispute regarding partition of family property, accused persons attacked the informant and two other persons.

¶4An FIR no.149 of 2023 of the same incident was lodged on the same day from the side of the applicant also on the same date, against four persons, stating that they had beaten up the informant and his family members.

¶5A co accused-Arvind had suffered a head injury and a fracture in right side of ring finger in the incident.

¶6In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. The co-accused, Nirmala and Arvind have been granted bail by means of the orders dated 21.09.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application nos.11377 of 2023 and 11691 respectively.

¶7The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶8Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶9Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶10Let the applicant-Suraj be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 3.11.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.