- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 13021/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13021 of 2023 Applicant :- Rajan Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.
¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0835 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao.
¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 12.10.2022 against four persons, including the applicant in furtherance of an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. alleging that the co-accused Ashok Kumar Nishad had introduced the informant to co-accused Manoj Shukla and Manoj Shukla had offered that he would get one Deshraj to sell his land to the informant. Accordingly, the informant purchased the land but subsequently it transpired that the sale deed was executed by some imposter. During investigation, it came into light that the applicant set up his brother-in-law Dhunnar as a seller.
¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. A co-accused Ashok Kumar Nishad has been granted bail by means of order dated 29.8.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10801 of 2023.
¶5The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
¶6Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the only allegation against the applicant is of having set up his brother-in-law and co-accused Virend Kumar have already been granted anticipatory bail and Ashok Kumar Nishad has been granted bail, whereas the applicant is languishing in jail since
19.09.2023 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
¶7Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
¶8Let the applicant-Rajan Pandey be released on bail in Case Crime No.0835 of 2022, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Virendra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.