Smt. Poonam Chaudhary v. Mr. Masihuzzama Siddiki District Basic Education Officer

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2820 of 2017 Applicant :- Smt. Poonam Chaudhary Opposite Party :- Mr. Masihuzzama Siddiki District Basic Education Officer Counsel for Applicant :- Mewa Ram Satyarihi,Arvind Kumar Bhandari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ajay Kumar Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Mewa Ram Satyarthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer, Hardoi, namely, Sri Vijay Pratap Singh for the reason that the current opposite party has not been impleaded till date.

¶2Sri Prashant Singh has sought instructions on the direction of this Court to the effect as to whether the order of Writ Court dated 29.08.2017 passed in Writ Petition No. 19905(SS) of 2017 has been complied with or not. On the basis of telephonic instructions being sought from the present BSA, Hardoi, Sri Prashant Singh has stated that medical leave of the petitioner has been sanctioned and pursuant thereto her salary for the period of medical leave would be paid within two weeks.

¶3In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt petition.

¶4Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶5Notices, if any, are discharged.

¶6However, it is expected that the petitioner shall be paid the salary for the period of her medical leave within a period of three weeks, be more precise on/before 02.12.2023, failing which the liberty is given to the petitioner to file an application seeking revival of the present contempt petition. If such application is filed in the contempt petition and it is found that the order of Writ Court has not been complied with, any coercive order may be passed against the current BSA, Hardoi after permitting the petitioner to implead him in person. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 3.11.2023 kkv/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench