Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Rajneesh and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10861 of 2023 Applicant :- Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Rajneesh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard.

¶2As it is evident from the record that summoning order was passed on 14.10.2011, and thereafter, on 31.07.2014, on their surrender application, applicants were taken into custody, thereafter, they were enlarged on bail but learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants were residing in Guwahati, therefore, they were not aware about the summoning order.

¶3As the statement of learned counsel for the applicants is contradictory to the order sheet of the impugned proceedings, therefore, application is misconceived and liable to be dismissed.

¶4Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench