- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9608/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9608 of 2023 Petitioner :- Abdul Wahab Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chhaya Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Case is called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of petitioner. Sri Dilip Pandy, learned counsel for respondent Gaon Sabha and learned Standing Counsel for State are present.
¶2Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that his proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code were dismissed and against the same an appeal was preferred which was also dismissed.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel raises preliminary objection that against the said order, petitioner has an alternative remedy of revision and this Court can not interfere with the execution proceedings unless the original order is challenge before the appropriate authority.
¶4Thus, with liberty to petitioner to file a revision before the appropriate authority, present writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.