- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 November 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 9714/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9714 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mr. Sanvali Prasad Respondent :- Commissioner Devi Patan Division (Mandal) Devi Patan Gonda And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard Sri Skand Bajpai,Advocate holding brief of Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Upendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative and statutory remedy of revision before the State Government against the impugned order and even otherwise the petitioner has not sufficiently disclosed the delay and laches in filing this petition, whereas learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has disclosed the delay and laches in paragraph 11 of the petition. However, he could not dispute the availability of alternative and statutory remedy of revision. In view of above, the petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative and statutory remedy. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Akanksha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.