VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suresh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8045/2023

Judgment

Court No. -10 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -8045 of 2023 Petitioner :-Suresh Kumar Yadav Respondent :-State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :-Durgesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :-G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Impleadment applicant filed today is allowed. Let necessary impleadment be carried out during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and learned counsel appearing for the Purvanchal Vidyut Vitram Nigam Limited. This petition has been filed praying the following reliefs:-

(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned first information dated 7.4.2021 vide case crime no. 491 of 2021 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, lodged at Police Station-Anti Power Theft Thana Pratapgarh, District-Pratapgarh (Anti Power Theft) as contained in Annexure-1 to this writ petition.

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party not to harass, detain or prosecute the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has statutory remedy of filing representation before the Executive Engineer of the Distribution Division concerned under Section 152 of the Electricity Act. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to approach the opposite party no. 6 by way of representation within two weeks from today. The petitioner shall complete all formalities as required for moving of such representation. The opposite party no. 6 shall take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks. For a period of eight weeks or till the decision taken by the opposite party no. 6, whichever is earlier, the arrest of the petitioner shall remain stayed. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Anuj Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.