VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrabhan and Another v. State of UP Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt Civil Sect Lko and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
2515/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2515 of 2023 Applicant :- Chandrabhan And Another Opposite Party :- State Of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt Civil Sect Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Nayak, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A-I for the State.

¶2The instant application has been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.84 of 2019, under Sections 147, 323, 324, 325, 504 IPC & Section 3(1) Da, 3(1) Dha of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Aliganj, District Ambedkar Nagar.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 05.06.2019 against eight persons, including the applicants, alleging that all the accused persons had beaten up the informant's father and one Sikander.

¶4The medico legal examination reports of the victims mention numerous injuries suffered by them, including fracture of teeth.

¶5Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that two persons have received numerous injuries, including grievous injury, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts do not warrant exercise of discretion of this Court by granting pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

¶6The anticipatory bail application is rejected accordingly. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Renu/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.