VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kismtum Nisha v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy Deptt of Home Civil Sectt Lko and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8563/2023

Judgment

Court No. -10 Case :-CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. -8563 of 2023 Petitioner :-Kismtum Nisha Respondent :-State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy Deptt Of Home Civil Sectt Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :-Shankar Lal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :-G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA who appears on behalf of State-respondents and perused the record. This petition has been filed praying the following main reliefs:-

i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus for directing and commanding the opposite parties concerned that they consider the case of the petitioner and transfer the investigation of the case crime/F.I.R. No. 172 of 2023 under Sections 434, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Jamo, district-Amethi and further to ensure the fair and speedy investigation within reasonable time, in the interest of justice. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although the F.I.R. was lodged by the petitioner on

5.7.2023 but the Investigating Officer is conducting a fair investigation and he is in collusion with the opposite parties. We have perused the averments made in the writ petition and are not convinced that any direction, as has been prayed for by the petitioner in this writ petition, can be granted in these proceedings. The Supreme Court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and others, reported in (2016) 6 SCC 277 relying upon an earlier judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in (2008) 2 SCC 469 has held that this Court normally should not entertain such petitions for the reason that complainant in such situations is at liberty to avail the alternative remedy by approaching the Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition, which is hereby disposed of with the observation that it will be open to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate concerned by moving an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. If any such application is moved by the petitioner/complainant, the same shall be dealt in accordance with law by the Magistrate concerned. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Anuj Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.