- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- 5703/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5703 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jogi And 3 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.), Kaiserganj, Bahraich And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Raman Mishra Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
¶1Heard Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitoner and Ashish Raman Mishra, learned counsel for caveator/respondent no. 5.
¶2In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with.
¶3Present petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:- " i. Direct the opposite party no.1 to decide the application for temporary injunction numbered as 6-Ga pending in Regular Suit No.2321/2023 (Jogi and others Versus Chhotey Lal and others), as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. ii. Direct the private opposite parties to maintain the status quo over the property in question, during pendency of Regular Suit No.2321/2023 (Jogi and others Versus Chhotey Lal and others) before opposite party no.1."
¶4Considering the fact that the application seeking temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. read with Section 151 C.P.C. preferred by the petitioners is pending consideration as also that application of such nature should be decided within a period of six months failing which the presiding officer is required to record the reasons thereof as per the Circular No.C.L. No.24/Admin. G-II dated Allahabad
16.08.2017, issued by this Court on administrative side, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1-Civil Judge (J.D.), Kaiserganj, Bahraich to decide the aforesaid application, under consideration, after taking note of the circular, quoted above, most expeditiously.
¶5The benefit of the order would be available to the petitioner if he would appear on the each date fixed in the case.
¶6It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority/court concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 7.11.2023/Mohit Singh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.