Banwari Lal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, U.P. Lucknow and 4 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9757 of 2023 Petitioner :- Banwari Lal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, U.P. Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhruvendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Petitioner claims that he is paid less compensation with regard to Gata No. 702, 703, 952 & 953 of village-Bighapur, District Unnao, acquired by NHAI. Learned counsel for the NHAI states that petitioner has alternative remedy to file an arbitration case under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, before the Arbitrator. In case, such an arbitration is filed before the Arbitrator, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench