Doctor Pushplata Shami v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Lko. and 4 Others

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8684 of 2023 Petitioner :- Doctor Pushplata Shami Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.Usman Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for grant of second, third and fourth ACP benefits with consequential benefits and arrears.

¶3It has been submitted that aforesaid benefits have not been provided to petitioner due to pendency of disciplinary proceedings. It is submitted that enquiry report has been submitted against petitioner but final orders have not yet been passes by the State Government.

¶4For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer with regard to final decision on the same.

¶5Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Medical U.P. who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation.

¶6With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 kvg/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench