Muinuddeen v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Secrt. Lko

Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11004 of 2023 Applicant :- Muinuddeen Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri,Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶2By means of the instant applicant, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every seven cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all seven cases.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in seven cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No.307 of 2023, under Sections 454, 380, 411 of IPC, PS-Indra Nagar, District -Lucknow. 2) Case Crime No.326 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 of IPC, PS-Indra Nagar, District -Lucknow. 3) Case Crime No.200 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 of IPC, PS-Vikas Nagar, District -Lucknow. 4) Case Crime No.438 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457, 413, 34 of IPC, PS-Thakurganj, District -Lucknow. 5) Case Crime No.399 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 of IPC, PS-Thakurganj, District -Lucknow. 6) Case Crime No.298 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 of IPC, PS-Thakurganj, District -Lucknow. 7) Case Crime No.442 of 2023, under Sections 380, 457, 511, 34 of IPC, PS-Thakurganj, District -Lucknow.

¶4He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶5Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra).

¶6Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench