- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- 5705/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5705 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhola And 2 Others Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate (Sdm) Ram Sanehi Ghat Distt. Barabanki And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Tiwari,Saurabh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of Case No. 966/2022 (Sukhdeen and others vs. Rampal and others) filed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending before the respondent No. 1/Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Ram Sanehi Ghat, District Barabanki. Taking note of period of pendency of the case, in issue, as also Rule 109(10) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as per which, a suit for partition preferred under Section 116 of the Code of 2006 should preferably be decided within a period of six months, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Case No. 966/2022 (Sukhdeen and others vs. Rampal and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Arun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.