- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9788/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9788 of 2023 Petitioner :- Lal Bahadur Soni Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujit Kumar Ojha,Ajay Kumar Ojha,Prabhat Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that though an order was passed in his favour under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the boundaries were also demarcated by fixing pillar, the same are being damaged by the private respondents. Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner has remedy for filing an application under Section 227 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 before the Tehsildar concerned, who may take appropriate action in accordance with law. In view of above, the petitioner is permitted to move an application under Section 227 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Tehsildar Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgar for any violation of order passed. In case such application is filed, the same may be decided within six week after hearing all parties concerned in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 7.11.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.