- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9841/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9841 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Sectt.Lko And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State.
¶2Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order dated 24.04.2023 passed by respondent no.3 Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Fatehpur, District-Barabanki.
¶3By the said order, the respondent no.3 has held that petitioner can not move a representation and he ought to move appropriate application by leading his evidence under Section 38(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and thereafter only appropriate action can be taken.
¶4We do not find any illegality in the said order. In view thereof, no case for interference is made out.
¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate application before the appropriate authority in accordance with law, if he so desires. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.