VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sattira Devi v. Bal Krishan Executive Engineer Vidyut Vitran Khand-1 Madh

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
Rajesh Singh Chauhanauthor
Case no.
CAPL 1771/2017

Judgment

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1771 of 2017 Applicant :- Sattira Devi Opposite Party :- Bal Krishan Executive Engineer Vidyut Vitran Khand-1 Madh Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mayank Sinha,Shreeprakash Singh,Ved Prakash Shukla Ii Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mayank Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

¶2Sri Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties has stated that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with in its letter and spirit. He has further submitted that despite the fact that the petitioner has been discharging her duties as Anganbadi Karyakatri at Anganbadi Centre-Pakdi, Development Block-Dubeypur, District-Sultanpur, since February, 2005 and the same fact has not been disclosed before the Court, even then, considering the fact that her late husband was a contract employee she has been offered appointment as direct employee through outsourcing agency, namely, M/S Radhey Enterprises, Gondwa, Katawan, Sultanpur, as the letter dated 28.02.2018 to this effect has been annexed as Annexure No.SA-2 with the application for framing of the charges along with affidavit filed on 15.04.2018.

¶3Sri Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties has further submitted, on the basis of information so received, that the petitioner has not submitted her joining on the post in question.

¶4On that, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner was entitled regular appointment, therefore, she has not submitted her joining. He has further submitted that till date the petitioner has not been provided regular appointment.

¶5However, on being confronted as to why this fact has not been disclosed to the Court that the present petitioner has been serving as Anganbadi Karyakatri since February, 2005, learned counsel for the petitioner could not explain the same.

¶6In view of the above, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶7Notices, if any, stand discharged. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.