VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj Khanna v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8608/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8608 of 2023 Petitioner :- Manoj Khanna Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. who appears on behalf of the State Respondents and Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.4, which is taken on record.

¶2This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "a. a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 26.08.2023, registered at Case Crime No. 0418/2023, U/s-147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3(1)(tha), 3(1)(gha), 3(2)(va), S.C/ S.T act, Police Station Bhira, District-Kheri, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. b. a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to take appropriate action against the opposite no.3 to 7 not hearse to the petitioner in Case Crime No. 0418/2023, U/s-147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., & 3(1)(tha), 3(1)(gha), 3(2)(va), S.C/ S.T act, Police Station Bhira, District-Kheri."

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime has stated before this Court that both the parties have compromised to each other, a copy of the compromise has been filed as annexure no. 4 to the petition.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the private respondent does not dispute the contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶5The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner and the private respondent to approach the Investigating OfÏcer alongwith original copy of the Compromise within two weeks from today and the Investigating OfÏcer shall take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter.

¶6For a period of six weeks or till the appropriate action taken by the Investigating OfÏcer, the petitioner shall not be arrested in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Darpan Sharma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.