Meera Shukla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9822 of 2023 Petitioner :- Meera Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Secrt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Ambrish Rai, learned counsel for the Union of India and Sri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel for NHAI.

¶2The petitioner claims that compensation paid by NHAI for acquisition of her land is not sufficient.

¶3Learned counsel for NHAI raises a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an application under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act.

¶4With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is consigned to record. However, in case such an application is filed by petitioner, the Arbitrator shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing all parties concerned. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench