VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harish Chandra Sharma and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
7 November 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
10964/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10964 of 2023 Applicant :- Harish Chandra Sharma And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Sri Shravan Kumar, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the criminal proceeding of Case No. 151/2020, "State Vs. Harish Chandra Sharma & others" Case Crime No. 0045/2020, U/S : 323/324/504 & 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Bazar Khala, District-Lucknow as well as summoning order dated

17.07.2020.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated

11.04.2023 a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 05.08.2023.

¶6Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court.

¶7Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.

¶8In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶9For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and the criminal proceeding of Case No. 151/2020, "State Vs. Harish Chandra Sharma & others" Case Crime No. 0045/2020, U/S : 323/324/504 & 506 I.P.C. Police Station-Bazar Khala, District-Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 17.07.2020 are hereby quashed.

¶10Office is directed to communicate this order to trial court forthwith. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Vipul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.