- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 1552/2005
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1552 of 2005 Petitioner :- Lucknow Development Authority Thru Secy. Lucknow Land Respondent :- Smt. Sharda Shukla And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Singh,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioner-Lucknow Development Authority has approached this Court challenging the supplementary award dated
15.7.2004 passed by respondent no.6-Additional District Magistrate (Land Acquisition), Nagar Mahapalika-I, Lucknow.
¶3A preliminary objection is raised by learned counsel for respondents that petitioner has an alternative remedy to challenge the said award by way of reference under Section 18(1) and 18(3) of the Land Acquisition Act as amended in the State of U.P.
¶4Learned counsel for petitioner-Lucknow Development Authority could not dispute the correctness of the said submission.
¶5In view thereof, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner-Lucknow Development Authority to file a reference against the aforesaid supplementary award. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.