Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sugarcane Development and Sugar Industry U.P. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1051 of 2023 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sugarcane Development And Sugar Industry U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand Shanker Asthana Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

¶1Sri Anand Shankar Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent at the very outset has raised preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the present writ petition on the ground that the allotment of the sugarcane purchase centres has not yet been finalized by the Cane Commissioner. Even after finalization of any such process, the aggrieved party has an alternative remedy of appeal before the State government under Section 15(4) of the U.P. Sugarcane(Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953.

¶2In view of the above, the writ petition not being maintainable is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 kanhaiya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench